It may have happened once or twice during the war, but that's hardly consistency.īecause of composite armor being so much stronger than steel, comparatively thin plate of perfectly vertical composite armor on the rear of MBTs give the vehicle ~500mm of equivalent steel armor protection No, they weren't pinpoint lasers popping enemy tanks kilometers away. Yes, German tanks were designed with longer ranged combat in mind. There is no point in arguing with someone like this. Okay, you are just one of those people who just wank to German tanks. Like I said, it doesn't have to penetrate. Repeated hits would cause spalling, killing the crew. Even if they don't hit, German steel by the end of the war when the Maus was produced was very brittle. Eventually a shell is gonna start causing damage. It doesn't matter if the initial salvo doesn't hit it. The odds of artillery hitting it directly and knocking it out are pretty damned low. We are talking about the largest tank ever made, after all. It is actually a relatively small target, Slope Multipliers Posts: Tiger vs T-34 vs M4A3E8, Tiger vs M4A3E8 (angled at 45°), Tiger vs Panther vs M4A3E8, T-34 vs Tiger I vs M4A1. YouTubers that run armour penetration simulations
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |